Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


Welcome to Fuji X Forum!

Welcome to the Fuji X Forum, the world's largest online community of Fujifilm X camera users!

Creating a forum account is FREE! or CLICK HERE TO LOG IN

Registration enables you to post in the community, and be notified to replies.

Other benefits: sharing photos, creating a photo gallery, get answers to technical questions, assistance with trouble-shooting, elgibility for contests, and more!

Registering is easy and simple. Become a part of the forum by creating an account. You can also log in using Facebook, Twitter or Google.

We take pride in being the friendliest photo forum on the net.

Come on in join the fun!

Note: after registering if you don't see the validation email, check your spam folder.
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo

No visible CA even in the bokeh area


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 videogamemaker

videogamemaker

    Member

  • Member
  • 1,127 posts
  • Local time: 11:25 PM
  • LocationIceland

Posted 15 March 2011 - 04:46 AM

It was my understanding (but not sure why I think this is true) that CA can be corrected along the edges of sharp objects, but not fully for the out of focus areas. Is this true? I always thought it was because you could figure out how many pixels worth (in a full size raw image) of CA to subtract out for the focus plane, but items out of focus exasperated the aberrations and there was no way to know just how far out of focus they were to subtract the right amount out from the blurry edges.

I ask because I noticed this from the 2nd X100 vs X1 shootout on flickr:

Posted Image

The X1 image has some CA (acceptable, but it's there) on the blurry tree in the background (on the leaf edge too, but any good software would take care of that). The X100 image has none on the leaf, which the jpeg engine could be correcting in camera, but neither does the blurry tree in the background. This points to the lens actually having a near perfect lack of CA, right? Is this a logical conclusion or am I missing something related to how lenses and CA works?

#2 brkl

brkl

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • 211 posts
  • Local time: 01:25 AM

Posted 15 March 2011 - 05:20 AM

Please

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

or

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

to view this post.


#3 videogamemaker

videogamemaker

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • 1,127 posts
  • Local time: 11:25 PM
  • LocationIceland

Posted 15 March 2011 - 05:32 AM

Please

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

or

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

to view this post.


#4 wchutt

wchutt

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • 501 posts
  • Local time: 05:25 PM

Posted 15 March 2011 - 07:14 PM

Please

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

or

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

to view this post.


#5 disign

disign

    Member

  • Member
  • 117 posts
  • Local time: 11:25 PM

Posted 16 March 2011 - 01:39 AM

Please

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

or

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

to view this post.


#6 videogamemaker

videogamemaker

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • 1,127 posts
  • Local time: 11:25 PM
  • LocationIceland

Posted 16 March 2011 - 04:45 AM

Please

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

or

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

to view this post.





0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users