Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Cecilia Camera Straps Preview

Posting tip: click on 'Add to Post' when attaching an image. This way it will appear on the What's New page.

Welcome to Fuji X Forum!

Welcome to the Fuji X Forum, the largest online community of Fujifilm X camera users!

Creating a forum account is FREE!

The primary benefit to registering is so you can post in the community, and be notified when discussions are updated.

Other benefits include uploading photos, creating a photo gallery, getting answers to technical questions and assistance with trouble-shooting, communicate with other members via private messages, elgibility for contests, and more!

Registering is a simple process that requires minimal information. Become a part of the forum by signing in or creating an account. For your convenience you can sign in using Facebook, Twitter or Google.

We take pride in being the friendliest photo forum on the net.

Come on in join the fun!
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo

X100S Clipping Blacks in JPEG

X100S X100

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 johnnydanger

johnnydanger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Joined 01-December 11
  • Local time: 06:08 AM

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:47 PM

Just got my new X100S and am 90% enthused and 10% dismayed.  It's clear that the blacks are clipping badly when shooting in JPEG, plus the compressing/detail/artifacting is not good and there is noted posterization in the shadows.  The RAW look great, but the JPEGs are miles behind the X-Pro1 in terms of quality.  Working on finding a solution... maybe Shadow tone -2 and then apply a batch curve to all the JPEGs?  It seems to help.  But basically there's no detail in the blacks especially if you try and pull them up at all even one stop.  See attached comparison images.  I was expecting the X100S JPEGs to equal the X-Pro1 JPEGs, but they're miles off unfortunately.  Now if only there was a good tool to quickly process .RAF files with good results.  Some day maybe.

 

Attached are some images all shot in Standard:

 

1) An ISO 800 JPEG pushed 1.5 stops side by side with the same image RAW file in Accuraw.  The JPEG is lacking significant detail and has some gnarly color posterization that really shouldn't be there when shooting in Fine JPEG.

 

2) An ISO200 X-Pro1 JPEG next to an X100S JPEG, same aperture, ISO, shutter speed, both pushed 1.5 stops to see what detail is available in the shadows (none on the X100S JPEG...)

 

3) An ISO200 JPEG OOC, 1/60, f4 showing the painfully clipped blacks.

 

Anyone found a remedy to the mediocre JPEGs on the X100S?  I'm going to try Shadow Tone -1 and -2 to see how they do and if that'll open up the shadows.

Attached Files



#2 Bashar AR

Bashar AR

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 879 posts
  • Joined 05-July 11
  • Local time: 10:08 AM
  • LocationEarth

Posted 31 March 2013 - 10:00 PM

you are so right, i thought i was going crazy, its clipping the blacks and in bright sun its clipping the whites and  the blacks!!!, never had this issue with other x cameras, i am shooting at default settings, confused?! 

 

8608982560_809a7aae08_c.jpg

8607873519_680316d98f_c.jpg



#3 InTheMist

InTheMist

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 57 posts
  • Joined 29-March 13
  • Local time: 04:08 PM
  • LocationSwitzerland

Posted 01 April 2013 - 12:09 AM

Guys, those are insane exposure situations - especially in JPEG!
Even my D800 would need very careful exposure and raw adjustments to pull details out of the shadows without blowing the highlights.

If you insist on JPEG, have you tried DR400 in those cases? Even so, if the X100S can make those scenes work when shooting JPEG, color me impressed! I'm still waiting on mine.


Edited by InTheMist, 01 April 2013 - 12:46 AM.

Tim

Twitter:@Inthemistphoto 

Flickr:   InTheMist


#4 Bernardo Nielsen

Bernardo Nielsen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts
  • Joined 27-March 13
  • Local time: 11:08 AM
  • LocationBelo Horizonte, Brazil

Posted 01 April 2013 - 12:21 AM

With a bit of research on the web I found that the X100S has less dynamic range in it's JPEGs than the x100.

 

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

 

It seems like the x100S has more dynamic range for it's raw files though.

 

And there are also the dynamic range settings that could make somewhat of a difference in your pictures.

 

 

I've never really used a Fuji camera before, and am trying to decide what camera I should buy. Seeing all of the issues members of this forum seem to be having with the X100S, I'm starting to consider a x100. But I don't really know any better, could users of them both chime in?



#5 Fredrik

Fredrik

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 362 posts
  • Joined 16-June 11
  • Local time: 03:08 PM

Posted 01 April 2013 - 02:23 AM

Bernardo, think of all the users that are happy with their camera and doesn't go onto forums because they have an issue they need help with. There are most likely more happy users than unhappy. Go try the camera out at a store that offers a full return policy, try it out and then return it if you are not happy.

I've got a huge batch of RAWs and JPEGS to process this week when my iMac is back from getting a new LCD panel installed. When I'm done I'll post my impressions on clipping in JPEGs. However I have noticed that shooting with -1 in shadow tone produces far more nicer looking pictures. Fujifilm definitively changed this behavior from the X100.


X-T1 GS, serial 44MXXXXX, firmware 3.0

X-M1, serial 36LXXXXX, firmware 1.20

XF 23 1.4, XF 35 1.4, XF 27 2.8,  XC 50-230 4.5-6.7 OIS

X100S, serial 310XXXXX, firmware 1.20

X100, serial 12XXXXXX, firmware 1.30

 

Flickr | Blog | X100 review | X100S review

 


#6 Bashar AR

Bashar AR

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 879 posts
  • Joined 05-July 11
  • Local time: 10:08 AM
  • LocationEarth

Posted 01 April 2013 - 02:40 AM

I am loving my x-100s so far, the iq is mind blowing, it will take time to get to know the camera and how to get the best pictures out of it, it's a completely new animal,



#7 johnnydanger

johnnydanger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Joined 01-December 11
  • Local time: 06:08 AM

Posted 01 April 2013 - 06:21 AM

Just shot a full day around Kyoto with the X100S side by side with my X-Pro1.  Tomorrow I'll shoot it side by side with the X-Pro1 again and my X100 to get a good comparison across the board.

 

Basically, the X100S JPEGs are a let down.  The X-Pro1 runs circles around the X100S when shooting JPEGs.  The X100S JPEGs look clipped (because they are), they exhibit posterization in the shadow areas visible even at ISO200 and really pronounced when brought up using curves and/or S&H.  Shooting Standard with Shadow Tone at 0 is not an option in my opinion unless you like losing the bottom 10% of your image exposure detail.  I shot most of the day at Shadow Tone -2 to see if that would help and it provided a better base to work from with much more shadow detail, but with that being said it's still a let down due to the posterization and requirement for a good bit of work to get the midtones looking good again since ST -2 makes the image really flat.

 

I've attached an image that shows a comparison of the same shot in 3 versions: RAW conversion, tweaked JPEG, OOC JPEG.  Why Fuji can't make the image look more like the RAW JPEG conversion in-camera I'm not sure.  The X-Pro1 can do it, and so should the X100S be able to.

 

More shots coming soon showing the issues I'm experiencing.  The bottom line for me is that when shooting night shots with lots of black, or medium to high contrast daytime shots, the X100S JPEGs are unusable. They look like crap, plain and simple.  Which is a shame because that's what this camera should be good at, and the same sensor in the X-Pro1 is fantastic for.  Clearly some more work needs to be put in on Fuji's part to get the camera up to snuff to more closely match the X-Pro1 image quality.

Attached Files



#8 johnnydanger

johnnydanger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Joined 01-December 11
  • Local time: 06:08 AM

Posted 01 April 2013 - 06:32 AM

WHOAH, hold the presses.  I was just thinking... you know, I've seen posterization issues like this before... what if the color profile is messed up on the X100S JPEGs?  Looking at the images on the back of the camera shows a lot more shadow detail than what I'm getting in Aperture, so WTF.  And guess what, they are!  I have shot most of my images in AdobeRGB and by assigning them to sRGB (not converting) then BAM.  All the shadow detail magically appears.  So why are things f'ed up when viewing the images in Aperture and when opening in Photoshop?  I'm not sure but this is likely the issue, not the camera.

 

LEFT: AdobeRGB Profile (preserved when opened in PS)

RIGHT: sRGB Profile assigned in PS (not converted)

Attached Files


Edited by johnnydanger, 01 April 2013 - 06:34 AM.


#9 johnnydanger

johnnydanger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Joined 01-December 11
  • Local time: 06:08 AM

Posted 01 April 2013 - 06:51 AM

Two more examples showing the color space issue:

 

Attached Files



#10 johnnydanger

johnnydanger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Joined 01-December 11
  • Local time: 06:08 AM

Posted 01 April 2013 - 07:07 AM

Some last examples showing the color space problem: 1) A side by side at 100%, 2) Two 1200 pixel sized images showing the before/after color space assignment/conversion—much, much better!

 

 

Attached Files



#11 johnnydanger

johnnydanger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Joined 01-December 11
  • Local time: 06:08 AM

Posted 01 April 2013 - 07:15 AM

So... in summation: The solution to this issue is by setting the camera to shoot sRGB, not AdobeRGB.   It is apparent that the AdobeRGB menu option is just profiling the images as AdobeRGB and not actually saving the color values in the AdobeRGB space.

 

I just tested this, and indeed shooting sRGB fixes the issue and no more clipped blacks are visible. Phew.

 

Hey, I fixed my own problem!  I hope this helps someone else that experiences this same issue.  Surely Fuji will update their firmware to solve this issue in short order.


  • Boleigh, the_badger, camp and 2 others like this

#12 urbanshoot

urbanshoot

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 19 posts
  • Joined 11-March 13
  • Local time: 03:08 PM
  • LocationBelgium

Posted 01 April 2013 - 08:07 AM

Hey Johnny,

 

Thanks you very much for your findings :)



#13 johnnydanger

johnnydanger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Joined 01-December 11
  • Local time: 06:08 AM

Posted 01 April 2013 - 08:11 AM

Sure thing!  I'm just glad that I figured out what the deal was.  I was majorly bummed when the JPEGs weren't holding up since there is no good (and fast) RAW processing solution that fits into my workflow.  Just glad that the JPEGs are much better than I was seeing initially and am glad that my findings are helping others get the results they should be getting.

 

Cheers.



#14 Kev

Kev

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 46 posts
  • Joined 02-April 11
  • Local time: 09:08 AM
  • LocationToronto

Posted 01 April 2013 - 09:56 AM

Thanks again Johnny I had the same issue. I'll try the camera in sRGB today :)


Fuji X-Pro1 user

www.thepictorial.com

#15 Bernardo Nielsen

Bernardo Nielsen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts
  • Joined 27-March 13
  • Local time: 11:08 AM
  • LocationBelo Horizonte, Brazil

Posted 01 April 2013 - 10:30 AM

Bernardo, think of all the users that are happy with their camera and doesn't go onto forums because they have an issue they need help with. There are most likely more happy users than unhappy. Go try the camera out at a store that offers a full return policy, try it out and then return it if you are not happy.

I've got a huge batch of RAWs and JPEGS to process this week when my iMac is back from getting a new LCD panel installed. When I'm done I'll post my impressions on clipping in JPEGs. However I have noticed that shooting with -1 in shadow tone produces far more nicer looking pictures. Fujifilm definitively changed this behavior from the X100.

That's a very good point Fredrik, thank you very much. Unfortunately I won't find a camera to test in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, but as soon as I get to Maine for a workshop I'll be buying a Fuji X camera.

I'm an aspiring cinematographer and a camera assistant, so I'm used to bulky cameras and glass, and I really needed something that's small and practical, so I can concentrate on making images myself without thinking about equipment all the time. I'll be shooting JPEGs mostly, and the dynamic range issue bothers me a bit. Not that it's an issue in itself, just that I'm still in that pre-buying paranoia stage. =)

 

So far the X100 has dynamic range and price going for it, with images that are a little bit softer and more magenta.

The X100S has the new improved AF (even though it seems like a lot of people don't notice the difference in firmware 1.01), and the lack of an AA filter and the extra megapixes produce a bit more of fine detail and sharpness.

 

I guess the main question for me is the ease of use, and if the x100S AF is really better than the x100's, then I guess that's the camera for me. But I still get a little bit bummed that the original x100 JPEGs have more dynamic range. 

 

Sure thing!  I'm just glad that I figured out what the deal was.  I was majorly bummed when the JPEGs weren't holding up since there is no good (and fast) RAW processing solution that fits into my workflow.  Just glad that the JPEGs are much better than I was seeing initially and am glad that my findings are helping others get the results they should be getting.

 

Cheers.

 

Thank you very much for your findings Johnny!

Now I'm curious about that graph I posted earlier in the thread. I wish I knew if it was calculated after a color space conversion or not. Can anyone compare the dynamic range between the two cameras with this deal solved on the X100S?



Man, I'm dying to stop thinking about these things and just getting out there and shooting!







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: X100S, X100

0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users