Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Welcome to Fuji X Forum!

Welcome to the Fuji X Forum, the world's largest online community of Fujifilm X camera users!

Creating a forum account is FREE! or CLICK HERE TO LOG IN

Registration enables you to post in the community, and be notified to replies.

Other benefits: sharing photos, creating a photo gallery, get answers to technical questions, assistance with trouble-shooting, elgibility for contests, and more!

Registering is easy and simple. Become a part of the forum by creating an account. You can also log in using Facebook, Twitter or Google.

We take pride in being the friendliest photo forum on the net.

Come on in join the fun!

Note: after registering if you don't see the validation email, check your spam folder.
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

X-Pro 2


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 cyberprimate

cyberprimate
  • Member
  • 234 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 AM
  • LocationParis

Posted 07 February 2012 - 06:08 PM

The number 1 in the X-Pro1 suggests there will be an X-Pro 2 some day. Not for now obviously but it will exist.

What kind of change can one expect? Could it be an improved version of the X-Pro1 or more like its big brother with FF format?



#2 nat3970

nat3970
  • Member
  • 104 posts
  • Local time: 05:50 PM

Posted 07 February 2012 - 06:52 PM

The number 1 in the X-Pro1 suggests there will be an X-Pro 2 some day. Not for now obviously but it will exist.

What kind of change can one expect? Could it be an improved version of the X-Pro1 or more like its big brother with FF format?




At this stage its pure guesswork....I think that if Fuji is really serious about addressing the professional/enthusiast end of the market (and they certainly appear to be serious about it), then they likely have full frame model on their X roadmap.


Too much emphasis has gone into image quality for Fuji to ignore the obvious benefits of going full frame. Beyond improvements in IQ (using same sensor technology but applying it to full frame) it would also facilitate going "wider". This is going to prove important in a camera format that is not ideally suited to going "ultra long". Eliminating the "crop factor" would be an important evolutionary step for X line particularly as they expand use of high end glass (Fuji, Leica, Zeiss etc).


There are few things Fuji can do to X-Pro line that would more clearly signal their ascendancy to the top end of the market than to offer a FF option.

#3 cyberprimate

cyberprimate
  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • 234 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 AM
  • LocationParis

Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:23 PM

The X-Pro 2 you're describing would be logically even more expensive than the X-Pro1. That would be a lot of money. Cheaper than a Leica but one needs to have strong attachment to mirrorless cameras to not get a Nikon D800 and the like instead.



#4 whtchocla7e

whtchocla7e
  • Member
  • 153 posts
  • Local time: 08:50 PM

Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:36 PM

Going FF is a decision you make VERY early in the design stages.
If these new lenses are aps-c then don't count on a FF camera unless it's a completely different product line.



#5 cyberprimate

cyberprimate
  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • 234 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 AM
  • LocationParis

Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:45 PM

Yes, designing another series of lenses for FF format along tne APSC series would demand a big budget. But how many lenses available does Nikon have for their DSLR? More than a hundred vs 3 for the Fujis…



#6 PraxisPictures

PraxisPictures
  • Member
  • 117 posts
  • Local time: 08:50 PM
  • LocationToronto, Turtle Island

Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:20 PM

weather sealing and a rangefinder patch for manual focusing would be pretty sweet.


how complicated would it be to add the rangefinder patch?



#7 Neopan1600

Neopan1600
  • Member
  • 39 posts
  • Local time: 07:50 PM
  • LocationAurora, IL

Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:40 PM

Personally I would prefer a high definition EVF, around 5k, with focus peaking in the hybrid VF rather than an actual rangefinder mechanism. Maybe they can do a "digital" version of the rangefinder where a second sensor triangulates the focus distance rather than physical mirrors. The problem is I don't think you can use both a classic rangefinder along with autofocus, and I wouldn't be willing to give up autofocus.



#8 whtchocla7e

whtchocla7e
  • Member
  • 153 posts
  • Local time: 08:50 PM

Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:43 PM

how complicated would it be to add the rangefinder patch?


If a cheap film camera can have it, I don't see why an expensive digital camera couldn't.

#9 bwcolor

bwcolor
  • Premium Member
  • 560 posts
  • Local time: 06:50 PM
  • Location400 Miles North of LaLa Land

Posted 07 February 2012 - 10:52 PM

I've been very disappointed in my X-Pro1. I thought that it would be a camera that I would warm up to, but I haven't. In fact, the fricken camera hasn't even come out. So, how can I know what needs to be improved other than say everything?



#10 flysurfer

flysurfer
  • Premium Member
  • 3,077 posts
  • Local time: 03:50 AM
  • LocationNUE

Posted 08 February 2012 - 06:39 AM

I'd like to skip the X-Pro2, but I am very interested in the X-Pro3, so can we please discuss this camera and its improvements over the X-Pro2?

Thank you!



#11 Arjay

Arjay

    Admin

  • Admin
  • 10,445 posts
  • Local time: 03:50 AM
  • LocationMunich, Germany

Posted 08 February 2012 - 07:25 AM

I admire your common sense, Flysurfer. :lol:



#12 jknights

jknights

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 7,603 posts
  • Local time: 03:50 AM
  • LocationOliva, Valencia, Spain

Posted 08 February 2012 - 07:47 AM

I'd like to skip the X-Pro2, but I am very interested in the X-Pro3, so can we please discuss this camera and its improvements over the X-Pro2?

Thank you!


Glad you said it :lol:
At this stage all I want is to get my hands on a X-Pro1 with a 60mm lens attached.

#13 cyberprimate

cyberprimate
  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • 234 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 AM
  • LocationParis

Posted 08 February 2012 - 08:26 AM

The reality is that Fujifilm has probably been working on the X-Pro 2 already by now.


  • zen likes this

#14 zen

zen
  • Member
  • 198 posts
  • Local time: 08:50 PM
  • Locationnew jersey

Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:20 AM

The reality is that Fujifilm has probably been working on the X-Pro 2 already by now.



good job :) +1 they have been working on it for quite so time probably

#15 カメラマン

カメラマン
  • Premium Member
  • 388 posts
  • Local time: 10:50 AM
  • LocationOsaka, Washington DC

Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:56 AM

No X-Pro4, it wouldn't sell well in Japan. (4 (shi) is unlucky number, as shi can also mean death)